Robert W. Regenhardt, MD, PhD
System limitations to stroke care in urban Tanzania
Resident in Adult Neurology at MGH/BWH
PGY3
System limitations to stroke care in urban Tanzania
Neurology Unit sign |
The primary purpose of my visit to the Neurology Ward at
Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania was to enroll
patients in a trial examining disability and mortality after stroke. In
addition, I wanted to spend time with the team clinically for the added
exposure and also think about interventions that could improve the care of this
patient population. MNH was established as the Sewahaji Hospital in ~1910 and
is the largest referral hospital and academic teaching hospital in Tanzania.
There are >1500 inpatient beds. Each week, 1000-1200 patients are admitted
to the inpatient services and 1000-1200 outpatients are seen. There is one male
and one female neurology unit.
Throughout my time rounding with the team, there were
several system limitations that I came across. Most of these limitations
stemmed from a relative lack of funding compared to hospitals such as MGH and
BWH. Unfortunately, these limitations existed from pre-hospital care to care
after discharge.
In the USA, patients with acute stroke are treated with tPA
if they arrive at a hospital within a 4.5 hour window in many cases. In
addition to tPA, several trials in 2015 showed the very significant benefit of
endovascular thrombectomy. During my 3 weeks rounding at MNH, I did not care
for a single patient that received tPA. While I was told the hospital had tPA
available, they almost never are able to use it as patients usually arrived
well outside of the time window. One of the senior clinicians asked me how
often we send patients for endovascular thrombectomy at MGH and BWH. He said he
didn’t think he’d see this intervention come to east Africa in his lifetime.
After admission, the work-up of some patients is limited by
insurance. Few patients complete vessel imaging (which can alter care by
determining eligibility for carotid endarterectomy) and some patients are
unable to complete MRI (to make sure the lesion is truly a stroke and not
something else such as tumor). Furthermore, there is no telemetry on the wards
to monitor for atrial fibrillation and no heart monitors are available for 30
day monitoring after discharge (to consider anticoagulation). After discahrge,
there are no acute rehab facilities, so patients must go home with the care of
their families and return for outpatient PT and rehabilitation.
Learning about these differences really made me appreciate
the embarrassment of riches that we have here at MGH and BWH. I think the next
steps will be discussing these system issues to prioritize them based on the
need and feasibility of interventions. Then, the most cost effective
interventions should be implemented to improve care.