Erica L Nelson
Resident in Emergency Medicine at Massachusetts General
Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital
PGY-4
October 16th, 2016
Anecdotes over tiny cups of Arabic coffee: the 17 year-old,
traumatic head bleed patient that waited
five days for transfer for
neurosurgical evaluation to a hospital located not even a 2-hour drive away. He
died. The 39 year-old woman who spent 14 months at Hadassah Hospital after
receiving a life-saving bone marrow transplant. She lived. The critically-ill
patient that was driven to the border in a Palestinian-permit ambulance, then moved
to a wheelchair to cross the border, then transferred to an Israeli-permitted ambulance
for the completion of the journey. A back-to-back transfer that took an extra hour
with oxygen lines and epinephrine still running. The cacophony of successes and
frustrations, tragedies and man-made miracles, politics and goodwill create
nothing less than a Pollock-painting when I try to disentangle the Palestinian
referral process. As a physician, an empiricist, I try to step back and
consider before the judgement.
First, an examination of ‘self’: How do we transfer patients
in the United States from a clinic to a hospital? One hospital to the next? An
institution outside of our medical record system? Is it a simple phone
call, a hurried and harried hospital summary, printed labs and consultation
notes, the coveted but oft-corrupted CD of imaging? Where do the referrals
land?
In our Emergency Departments, there’s all too often sighs
regarding incomplete documentation, a confusing narrative, the questionable
reason for transfer. Time-willing, there are phone calls and faxing, curriers
and clarifications. But how often do we start over, clicking through inordinate
EPIC tabs to order the reportedly-normal labs ‘just to have them in our
system’? Our process is not above reproach.
And with that in mind, let’s think about a cross-factional,
cross-border medical referral process:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b787e/b787e86f240a25fa8b29a9f5ebc053ea522f5ee3" alt=""
When first conducting feasibility interviews in January,
physicians (both Israeli and Palestinian) commented that there was hardly ‘a
process’, but multiple variations derived from a non-standardized, ambiguous,
unmonitored, untrackable system that required 1) referrals, 2) sponsorship and
3) Israeli travel permits. A whole host of complications were offered up –transfers
are untimely, procedures delayed, medical information lost, sponsorship and
reimbursements remain problematic. So, over the last 9 months, my research team
developed a survey to understand both referring and referral-accepting MD
experiences, and started building relationships with officials to obtain both
Palestinian and Israeli, disaggregated referral data.
These last two weeks in Israel and Palestine have been
several, tortoise-paced steps towards unfurling this project and ultimately
understanding an inherently complicated process in a stochastic environment
complete with multiple factions and border-crossings, two Ministries of Health,
three governments, varied donors, hospital structures and perspectives. Each
moment of analysis and judgement demands self-reflection and contextualization.
This study of a process is very much still in process.